News | Tax

Faceless Assessment: Fresh SOPs Issued to Address Taxpayers' Conflicts

The faceless authority has suggested a host of changes in the assessment process following conflicts and practical difficulties raised by taxpayers since the new regime was introduced. On 3rd August, the National Faceless Assessment Centre issued a set of standard operating procedures (SOPs) to address several anomalies in the regime.
The faceless centre, constituted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, is the nodal authority and works as an interface for the faceless regime.
Under the new SOP, an assessing officer will propose computation of income and loss after considering all aspects — differences and variations in the tax addition made by the department and responses submitted by the assessee — before passing the final order in the case.
The assessing officer will prepare an income and loss determination proposal (ILDP) after considering the taxpayers’ reply to a show-considering the taxpayers’ reply to a show-cause notice and a personal hearing in each case, it said.
The SOP states that ILDP should be fair and judicious. The assessing officer must submit it for risk analysis within a reasonable time. The initial tax notice under the faceless assessment will be more comprehensive and specific now, according to the SOP. It will be structured better after considering all internal data available to the assessment official.
The faceless unit has also suggested specific timelines for each step of the process.
The faceless authority has even defined roles of the assessment unit, verification unit, technical unit and review unit in the revised SOP, which was absent earlier.
Defining the role of each unit will ensure a smoother process and could lower litigation on procedural grounds.
Further, to improve compliance, the department will send a centralised communication to taxpayers in case of non-responsiveness of the notices. It also suggested sending a physical letter at the latest known address along with text messages of the assessee.
The authority also suggested key conditions for verifying the assessment case. It should be done in case of non-availability of digital footprint of “third person” (other than assessee). The assessing officer can seek verification if it requires -- cross verification of evidence, examination of books, recording of statement, examining of witness, etc.
Besides, the assessing officer can seek special audit in a specific case such as nature and complexity of accounts, volume of accounts, doubts about transactions, and specialised nature of business activity.
The authority also suggests that the final assessment order must contain specific information such as if the assessee seeks video conferencing without filing complete or any submission against show cause, inference made on the basis of which tax variations are being made, among others.
As the faceless scheme is evolving, it will require continuous rework to make it viable for taxpayers. The purpose of the scheme was to eliminate corruption and not to cause inconvenience to taxpayers, it noted.



To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

Changes in Our Business Model
25th Sept 2020
Greetings from Moneylife Advisory Services
Between financial years 2019-21, SEBI has come up with extensive changes to investor advisor regulations. On Sep 23, 2020, SEBI had issued new additional guidelines. This comes just two months after extensive changes announced in July 2020. Earlier, in December 2019 there was an ad hoc circular
As a result of these changes, IAs, cannot accept fees through credit cards, will have to sign a 26-clause investor agreement, have to maintain physical record written & signed by client, telephone recording, emails, SMS messages and any other legally verifiable record for five years. IAs were already asked to record the suitability and rationale for every piece of advice given, sign them and store them for five years.
While these extensive and frequent changes, designed to strengthen the conduct of IAs are well-meaning, these have sharply increased compliance efforts and cost. We, being online advisors, find many of changes harder to implement, compared to advisors working in the physical space. We will have to have an army of advisors, administrative and tech staff to be compliant. If we do this, we will have to divert money to these areas and the cost of our service will double. We want to remain the least-cost service in the market to benefit more and more people. In the circumstances, we are forced to change our business model from “advisory” to “research”. This will mean the following:
What remains the same:
  • Recommendations on insurance, investment and Lion stocks, will continue as a part of the MAS premium subscription. Our strength has always been research and this will remain available to you through our recommendations.
  • The magazine and all textual content will remain as part of the service
  • We will have to suspend the restructuring tool.
What changes:
  • The interactions in Ask / Handholding will offer investment advice but not specific to your situation. It will offer information on investment products and also clarify your doubts about various financial products. It will be a forum for information, not for advice. This will be implemented with immediate effect and our guidelines in Ask, reflect this now.
Over the next few weeks our site and our communication to you will reflect these and other additional changes.
We feel this will not affect you much in terms of what really matters in investing: knowing what to buy and when to buy. This is our edge and it will still be available to you.
Debashis Basu